Thursday, June 22, 2006

The new Duck duds



It's an improvement (although that's not particularly difficult). I would have preferred if they'd have kept a similar colour scheme to what they had, however.

7 Comments:

At 6:22 PM, June 22, 2006, Anonymous David said...

I don't think they could keep the colors. They wanted (and needed) to rebrand the team.

 
At 8:14 PM, June 22, 2006, Blogger Wardo said...

I was thinking that too. Why keep the eggplant scheme? That had to go.

-A

 
At 9:17 PM, June 22, 2006, Anonymous Karina said...

The NHL's graphic designers disappoint me.

 
At 10:17 PM, June 22, 2006, Anonymous J.R. said...

Ouch.

So they don't even have a real logo, just workmark? Or is that stupid webbed 'D' a logo?

So they're no longer the Mighty Ducks of Anaheim -- is it Ducks of Anaheim or Amaheim Ducks of Los Angeles?

Glad I'm not a Ducks' (or whatever) fan.

 
At 10:19 PM, June 22, 2006, Blogger James Mirtle said...

They're just the Anaheim Ducks now — no funny business with the name.

 
At 11:28 PM, June 22, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

They wouldn't dare try any funny business like calling themselves "Los Angeles Ducks of Anaheim in Southern California" after what the city went through with the Angels.

It does look like the webbed-foot D will act as a logo. Not horrible, but a bit dorky.

 
At 12:00 AM, June 23, 2006, Anonymous Doogie2K said...

If that's their actual jerseys, that's lame. They could've at least had that other Thrashers-esque logo on Sleek's page as their jersey logo and that...word thing on their helmets. That would at least kinda work.

At least there's no diagonal stripes. Or purple.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Links to this post:

Create a Link


.

Free Page Rank Checker
eXTReMe Tracker