2014-15 NHL teams by height, weight and age
The usual annual stats compilation. These are based on opening night rosters.
| Teams | Weight | WRk | Height | HRk | Age | ARk |
| Anaheim | 210.1 | 1 | 73.5 | 9 | 27.0 | 24 |
| Arizona | 206.1 | 8 | 73.9 | 2 | 28.3 | 8 |
| Boston | 200.7 | 20 | 73.2 | 15 | 27.6 | 17 |
| Buffalo | 202.2 | 17 | 73.2 | 15 | 26.3 | 29 |
| Calgary | 196.3 | 30 | 72.7 | 27 | 28.2 | 10 |
| Carolina | 202.1 | 18 | 72.6 | 29 | 27.3 | 19 |
| Chicago | 196.7 | 29 | 73.0 | 21 | 28.1 | 12 |
| Colorado | 205.8 | 10 | 73.3 | 12 | 28.4 | 5 |
| Columbus | 202.5 | 15 | 73.0 | 21 | 26.2 | 30 |
| Dallas | 206.5 | 5 | 73.7 | 4 | 28.2 | 10 |
| Detroit | 202.4 | 16 | 73.3 | 12 | 28.4 | 5 |
| Edmonton | 197.4 | 28 | 73.1 | 19 | 26.4 | 28 |
| Florida | 203.3 | 12 | 73.7 | 4 | 28.3 | 8 |
| Los Angeles | 208.3 | 2 | 73.7 | 4 | 27.3 | 19 |
| Minnesota | 199.8 | 24 | 72.8 | 26 | 27.3 | 19 |
| Montreal | 203.3 | 12 | 72.7 | 27 | 27.9 | 14 |
| Nashville | 199.9 | 23 | 73.2 | 15 | 27.9 | 14 |
| New Jersey | 203.0 | 14 | 73.0 | 21 | 31.0 | 1 |
| NY Islanders | 205.0 | 11 | 72.9 | 25 | 27.2 | 22 |
| NY Rangers | 198.8 | 26 | 72.6 | 29 | 28.6 | 3 |
| Ottawa | 206.4 | 7 | 74.2 | 1 | 26.8 | 26 |
| Philadelphia | 201.3 | 19 | 73.5 | 9 | 28.4 | 5 |
| Pittsburgh | 199.6 | 25 | 73.2 | 15 | 28.5 | 4 |
| San Jose | 206.0 | 9 | 73.6 | 7 | 27.8 | 16 |
| St. Louis | 206.5 | 5 | 73.0 | 21 | 28.1 | 12 |
| Tampa Bay | 200.0 | 21 | 73.3 | 12 | 27.1 | 23 |
| Toronto | 200.0 | 21 | 73.1 | 19 | 27.0 | 24 |
| Vancouver | 197.8 | 27 | 73.6 | 7 | 28.8 | 2 |
| Washington | 207.4 | 3 | 73.5 | 9 | 27.4 | 18 |
| Winnipeg | 206.7 | 4 | 73.9 | 2 | 26.7 | 27 |
| Average | 202.7 | 73.3 | 27.8 |
by James Mirtle @ 3:29 p.m. | Permalink |
5 comments
5 Comments:
Jesus, the Devils are old as fuck and that's with Brodeur retired.
that is bizarre, there's not a single team with an average age of 29 or 30, yet the devils jump to 31.
This is a bit mis-leading. I've done a review that only includes the Top 9 forwards and Top 6 defence.
Things look a bit different, for example:
EDM Top 3 Lines : 6'0-5/8" 195.5 lbs
CHI Top 3 Lines : 6'0-1/8" 197.2 lbs
EDM Top 6 D: 6'1-3/8" 199.5 lbs
CHI Top 6 D: 6'0-5/8" 196.0 lbs
EDM Top 9 FWD: 6'1-1/8" 192.8 lbs
CHI Top 9 FWD: 6'1-5/8" 199.0 lbs
Summarizing:
Edmonton's top 3 lines are 2 lb lighter and 1/2" shorter than Chicago.
Edmonton's top 6 D are 3.5 lb heavier and 3/4" taller than Chicago.
Edmonton's top 9 Fwd's are 6 lb lighter and 1-1/2" shorter than Chicago.
It all depends on how you slice it.
Going by top 6 fwds and top 4 D shows a completly different view.
Except I'm not slicing it any way. I just took the averages from the league and presented them for people to look at.
You blew this hoax wide open Mel!!! Actually, unless your "corrections" somehow inadvertently predicted the outcome of the finals this season I'm thinking you wasted your typey muscles making a really bland point. ;)
Post a Comment
<< Home