2013 NHL teams by weight, height and age
Based on data from teams' opening rosters on Jan. 18
Weight | Height | Age | Wrank | Hrank | Arank | ||
Anaheim | 203.3 | 73.1 | 27.6 | 17 | 18 | 22 | |
Boston | 200.0 | 72.9 | 28.5 | 26 | 21 | 11 | |
Buffalo | 203.1 | 73.3 | 27.7 | 19 | 13 | 19 | |
Calgary | 195.5 | 72.8 | 28.3 | 30 | 23 | 14 | |
Carolina | 200.5 | 73.1 | 27.3 | 24 | 18 | 26 | |
Chicago | 203.0 | 72.3 | 27.7 | 20 | 29 | 19 | |
Colorado | 205.9 | 73.1 | 27.8 | 8 | 18 | 16 | |
Columbus | 204.5 | 73.3 | 26.9 | 12 | 13 | 30 | |
Dallas | 197.2 | 72.4 | 28.8 | 29 | 28 | 5 | |
Detroit | 201.2 | 72.6 | 29.6 | 22 | 26 | 3 | |
Edmonton | 203.8 | 73.5 | 27.6 | 16 | 8 | 22 | |
Florida | 201.2 | 73.5 | 29.7 | 22 | 8 | 1 | |
Los Angeles | 209.7 | 73.3 | 27.3 | 2 | 13 | 26 | |
Minnesota | 199.7 | 72.7 | 27.5 | 27 | 24 | 25 | |
Montreal | 197.3 | 72.1 | 27.8 | 28 | 30 | 16 | |
Nashville | 205.4 | 73.3 | 28.2 | 10 | 13 | 15 | |
New Jersey | 204.5 | 72.9 | 29.7 | 12 | 21 | 1 | |
NY Islanders | 200.3 | 72.7 | 28.7 | 25 | 24 | 8 | |
NY Rangers | 206.1 | 73.7 | 28.6 | 7 | 6 | 10 | |
Ottawa | 206.8 | 73.9 | 27.6 | 5 | 3 | 22 | |
Philadelphia | 202.7 | 73.8 | 27.8 | 21 | 5 | 16 | |
Phoenix | 204.2 | 73.4 | 28.8 | 14 | 11 | 5 | |
Pittsburgh | 203.3 | 73.3 | 28.5 | 17 | 13 | 11 | |
San Jose | 210.7 | 74.0 | 28.7 | 1 | 1 | 8 | |
St. Louis | 205.8 | 72.6 | 27.7 | 9 | 26 | 19 | |
Tampa Bay | 206.2 | 73.7 | 28.8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | |
Toronto | 204.8 | 73.5 | 27.3 | 11 | 8 | 26 | |
Vancouver | 204.0 | 73.4 | 28.9 | 15 | 11 | 4 | |
Washington | 208.0 | 73.9 | 28.4 | 3 | 3 | 13 | |
Winnipeg | 207.3 | 74.0 | 27.3 | 4 | 1 | 26 | |
Average | 203.5 | 73.2 | 28.2 |
4 Comments:
It would be amazing to see a similar chart normalizing height and weight over icetime, to see who truly was the most effectively big. Right now you would have small-minute guys like John Scott creating a distortion that isn't really there.
LOVE!!!! the fact that the Kings are tied for the 2nd youngest team in the league AND have a Cup in their back pocket! Go get a couple more boys!!!!
I agree with you kmad but its still a fun list and they coula always be better.
They just might, Mike. But given how much the personnel changes from year to year in hockey, you never know. Very rare to see an NHL hockey team win multiple championships close together.
Post a Comment
<< Home